Figures et adéquation : dans la doctrine oratoire de Philippe Melanchthon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soucieux de transmettre une doctrine, théologique et morale, une et sans confusion, Melanchthon s'applique à définir les critères d'une méthode capable de produire et préserver la clarté de la pensée. Il trouve chez les Scolastiques l'outil recherché, la dialectique aristotélicienne, qu'il faut restaurer dans sa forme idéale. Cela reste cependant insuffisant pour la foule des imperiti , uniquement sensible à l'amplification. Pour concilier figures et adéquation, il faut poser une équivalence entre procédures logiques et procédés rhétoriques, rapport que Cicéron réalise le plus parfaitement. Melanchthon conserve cependant à la rhétorique aristotélicienne des symboles le privilège d'une plus grande « proximité » avec les choses. Il lèguera cette oscillation à la rhétorique allemande du XVIe et du début du XVIIe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".