MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125596974 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564817

A SVM classifier combined with PCA for ultrasonic crack size classification

2008· article· en· W2125596974 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chuxiong Miao, Yu Wang, Yonghong Zhang, Jian Qu, Ming J. Zuo, Xiaodong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Support vector machineArtificial intelligencePrincipal component analysisClassifier (UML)Feature selectionComputer scienceDimensionality reductionKernel Fisher discriminant analysisLinear discriminant analysisKernel principal component analysisKernel (algebra)Feature extractionRadial basis function kernelDimension (graph theory)Kernel methodMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pattern recognition may be used for crack size and type classification in ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation. Feature selection and reduction of computational complexity are two important problems to be solved in the development of pattern recognition algorithms. This paper describes a classifier based on support vector machines (SVM) and principal component analysis (PCA). The proposed approach can reduce the dimension of the feature vector by using PCA, which can dramatically reduce the input data dimension for SVM classification. The kernel fisher discriminant (KFD) is also described, which helps to select the parameters of the kernel function in SVM. Classification results using experiment data show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207