Broadband indoor wireless communications in the (20-60)GHz band: Signal strength considerations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Future wireless communication systems designed for indoor environments are expected to handle integrated voice, data, and video services. The use of millimeter waves in the 20GHz to 60GHz band for future indoor wireless communications appears to be a favorable choice as it provides sufficient bandwidth to support broadband services, current sparse usage, small RF device dimensions and favorable regulatory environment. This work is aimed to provide insight into the capabilities and limitations of the (20-60)GHz band in supporting future indoor wireless communications requirements from a signal strength perspective. This study is based on the currently available information about the (20-60)GHz band, such as: the attenuation rate of different building materials, the distance attenuation factors, the ambient noise, and the power requirements. The results were obtained through the simulation of indoor environments with propagation parameters typical of the MM-wave propagation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it