MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125620954 · doi:10.5555/1162708.1163074

Planning and control for a warranty service facility

2005· article· en· W2125620954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarrantyWorkloadTechnicianControl (management)Production (economics)Service (business)Computer scienceWork (physics)Reliability engineeringOperations managementBusinessEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A warranty service facility for industrial products that also provides internal support by reworking production defects is considered. An important concern is the evaluation of policies for how technicians with flexible skills should be moved between the service facility and adjacent production facility. Relevant measures include warranty cycle times and the overall technician utilization levels. An approach is developed that allows incoming warranty work loads to be monitored using control charts. Workload information is then used in simulating behavior using different flexing policies. As well, warranty cycle times are monitored using control charts. Results indicate the approach is of practical interest and can be effectively implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Statistical Process MonitoringFrench-language works237,207