The structure, photochemical reactivity, and photophysical properties of adamantyl X-substituted aryl ethers and a comparison with the alkyl groups, methyl, <i>tert</i>-butyl, and allyl
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure, photophysical properties, and photochemistry of the adamantyl aryl ethers 1 in both methanol and cyclohexane have been examined. UV absorption spectra, 13 C NMR chemical shifts, X-ray structures, and Gaussian calculations (B3LYP/6-31G(d)) indicate that these ethers adopt a 90° conformer in the ground state. In contrast, fluorescence spectra, excited singlet state lifetimes, and calculations (TDDFT) indicated a 0° conformer is preferred in the first excited singlet state S 1 . Irradiation in either solvent results in the formation of adamantane and the corresponding phenol as the major products, both derived from radical intermediates generated by homolytic cleavage of the ether bond. The 4-cyano substituted ether 1j was the only one to form the ion-derived product, 1-methoxyadamantane (16% yield), on irradiation in methanol. Rate constants of bond cleavage for these ethers from S 1 were estimated by two different methods by comparison with the unreactive anisoles 2, but the effect of substituents was too small to determine structurereactivity correlations. The temperature dependence of the quantum yields of the fluorescence of the unsub stituted, 4-methoxy and 4-cyano derivatives of 1 and 2 were also determined. These results indicated that the activated process for 1 was mainly bond cleavage for the 4-cyano substrate whereas for 2, it was internal conversion and intersystem crossing. Key words: aryl ether photochemistry, fluorescence, excited-state rate constants, excited-state temperature effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".