MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125665057 · doi:10.1515/htmp-2012-0071

Modification of Steelmaking Slag by Additions of Salts from Aluminum Production

2012· article· en· W2125665057 on OpenAlexafffund
D. C. Walker, W. F. Caley, S. Ferenczy, Georges J. Kipouros

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Temperature Materials and Processes · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsSteelmakingSlag (welding)ScrapMetallurgyDrossMaterials scienceBasic oxygen steelmakingAluminiumRaw materialSalt (chemistry)Waste managementChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The most common slag fluidiser in steelmaking is fluorspar, a mineral primarily composed of CaF 2 . Because of increasing consumption and decreasing availability of inexpensive fluorspar, steelmakers are seeking alternative means of achieving slag fluidity. One possible alternative to fluorspar is salt cake from secondary aluminium production. This salt is obtained from the used flux in remelting aluminium scrap and dross. This material is widely available and considered toxic (meaning that use in steelmaking helps to reduce environmental impacts from disposal). This project is an investigation of salt cake as a replacement for fluorspar in slag-fluidising applications by viscosity measurements and mass loss measurements at high temperatures (to evaluate the amounts of gases formed). In addition, characterisation of raw materials and melted slags by XRD, chemical analysis, and EPMA have been undertaken. The salt cake addition has a positive effect on slag fluidity, and shows promise for use in steelmaking slags.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigh Temperature Materials and ProcessesSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207