MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125672858 · doi:10.1086/315342

Molecular Analysis of the Accessory Gene Regulator<i>(agr)</i>Locus and Balance of Virulence Factor Expression in Epidemic Methicillin‐Resistant<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>

2000· article· en· W2125672858 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Papakyriacou, Dareyl Vaz, Andrew E. Simor, Marie Louie, Martin J. McGavin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirulenceBiologyVirulence factorMicrobiologyLocus (genetics)GeneGlycoproteinStaphylococcus aureusGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potential relationships between virulence factor expression and transmissibility were assessed in epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones CMRSA-1 and CMRSA-3. A major subtype of CMRSA-1 exhibited normal transcription of RNAIII, which facilitates the induction of secreted virulence factors and repression of colonization factor expression at high cell density. However, these isolates characteristically did not express alpha-toxin or protease and displayed a limited profile of secreted proteins. CMRSA-1 also expressed a novel cell surface glycoprotein and exhibited a unique polymorphism within the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus. CMRSA-3 displayed attenuated activation of RNAIII transcription, which was consistent with its higher fibronectin-binding and coagulase activity relative to sporadic MRSA or CMRSA-1 (P=.05), low protease activity, and limited profile of secreted proteins. Thus, the balance of virulence factor expression in CMRSA-1 and CMRSA-3 favors the colonization phase of infection, and CMRSA-1 possesses unique genotypic and phenotypic traits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207