MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125696972 · doi:10.5539/mas.v5n3p251

Design of Uniform Speed Control System for the Inclined Multi-axis Linear Motion Unit

2011· article· en· W2125696972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear motionMotion systemMotion controlControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceMotion (physics)Linear motorSynchronization (alternating current)Surface (topology)Degree (music)Motion planningPath (computing)MathematicsControl (management)PhysicsAcousticsGeometryComputer visionArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The linear motion unit is employed in the camera resolution detection system. Three linear motors are mounted on the flat surface, inclined surface of +40 degree and -40 degree. The multi-axis synchronization, speed precision and motion distance in the uniform speed motion sections should meet the system requirements. The key points of the uniform control system include the motion path planning, motor control and multi-axis control based on the CAN bus. The control system was designed especially and the precision of the uniform speed is 0.1% and the uniform distance is up to half of the whole motion distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it