MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125697358

Variation of astc ratings due to flanking transmission within a residential conversion

2012· article· en· W2125697358 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Clair Wakefield, Andrew Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntownEngineeringFlanking maneuverSound transmission classSoundproofingForensic engineeringStructural engineeringCivil engineeringGeographyAcoustics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Swift House is an older building in Victoria's downtown core that originally served warehouse and/or commercial purposes but many years ago was converted to a homeless shelter having many small rooms. Wakefield Acoustics Ltd. conducted a series of Apparent Sound Transmission Class (ASTC) tests between units and found the variability of measured ASTC's to be much wider than typically observed in new condominium buildings. This paper describes the ASTC tests conducted and discusses the suspected reason for the high variability in results. The BCBC recognizes that residential unit demising walls rarely provide the same degree of airborne sound insulation in field (real world) situations as they do in laboratory test situations. Reduced ASTC ratings in field tests are sometimes due to sound leakage via cracks and/or gaps, or to other flaws in wall construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207