Well Integrality Technical Practice of Ultra Deep Ultrahigh Pressure Well in Tarim Oilfield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There is abundant natural gas in Kuqa foreland area of Tarim basin, it has characteristics of reservoir burial depth (5500–7500m), high gas reservoir pressure (105–125Mpa), complex corrosive medium (the partial pressure of CO2 is beyond 2 Mpa, the chlorinity is between 100000 ppm and 140000ppm), and the overburden lithology of gas reservoir is complex (there is heavy calcium rock and mudstone layer), which bring well integrality high challenge. During over three years practice, through exploring the extreme high pressure down hole string shock checker, tubing tongs torque field proving, establishing extreme high pressure complex corrosion behavior pipe simulation behavior laboratory evaluation criterion, supporting air spider and threaded He gas tight detection device, several techniques are formed initially including extreme high pressure gas well pipe simulation behavior evaluation technique, extreme high pressure gas well wellbore evaluation technique, extreme high pressure gas well string layout and mechanical check technique, completion string quality control technique, it provides dynamic guarantee for long-term secure manufacture in Kuqa extreme high pressure extreme deep gas reservoir. Introduction There are tremendous natural gas resources in Quka foreland area of Tarim Basin. But the deep buried depth (5500–7500m TVD), high gas reservoir pressure (105–125Mpa), complex corrosive medium (CO2 partial pressure: 1–4Mpa, chloride ion concentration: 100000–140000ppm) and complex overlying rock lithology all have brought big challenges for well integrity management after being brought into production. According to the international generally accepted definition (as shown in figure 1), gas reservoirs in Quka foreland area of Tarim Basin are typically "Extreme Deep, Extreme High Pressure and High Temperature" with very complex operating conditions. Considering that the low reservoir porosity generally less than10%,low permeability less than 1md and along with some natural fractures developed, most wells have to get better performance after acidizing or hydraulic fracturing. At the initial stage of development, super 13Cr gas seal tubing were used as working string in completion operation. Considering the cost and well control factor, we did the hydraulic fracturing through the same completion string and then put into production directly. Wellbores have already suffered from abnormal high pressure during drilling. Given 115Mpa reservoir pressure, weighed fracturing fluid were used during treatment in most wells and we had 100–120Mpa pumping pressure with 136Mpa as the highest wellhead pressure and 210Mpa bottom of hole treating pressure. Meanwhile, acidizing inhibitor only could limitedly protect super 13Cr tubing under over 150 ?, even tubing/casing corrosion or piercement has happened just during treatment and flowback. Initial statistical result of shows that 35.48% of wells have well integrity problems, 63% of which are tubing string failures, 16% are casing string failures, 21% are wellhead failures and other failures. Workovers have been operated in 5 shut off wells to reproduce, each of which cost 20–40 million RMB. After Analysis above, Tarim Oilfield focus on the tubing string failure as the key well integrity research direction, which cover 63% of all well integrity failures. By fully considering casing program before completion, pressure control during operation, field quality control during tubing trips and practices in some other key parts, the better effectiveness is gained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".