MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125758823 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2008.83

Delay-Aware Rate Control for Multi-User Scalable Video Streaming Over Mobile Wireless Networks

2008· article· en· W2125758823 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Mansour, Vikram Krishnamurthy, Panos Nasiopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScalabilityReal-time computingNetwork packetPacket lossWireless networkSession (web analytics)Video streamingWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a delay and capacity constrained multi-user scalable video streaming scheme that improves the average end-to-end distortion of transmitted video streams compared to traditional streaming strategies. Wireless video streaming applications are characterized by their bandwidth-intensity, delay-sensitivity, and loss-tolerance. Our main contributions include: (i) an analytical expression for packet delay and play-out deadline of unequal erasure protection (UXP) protected scalable video, (ii) an analysis of the performance of delay-aware, capacity-aware rate allocation for optimized UXP streaming scenarios, (iii) proof that unequal error protection causes a rate-constrained optimization problem to be non-convex. Performance evaluations using a 3GPP network simulator show that, for different channel capacities and packet loss rates, delay- aware non-stationary rate-allocation delivers significant gains which range between 1.65 dB to 2 dB in average Y-PSNR of the received video streams over delay-unaware strategies. These gains come at a cost of increased off-line computation which is performed prior to the streaming session and therefore, do not affect the run-time performance of the streaming system. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207