MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125761272 · doi:10.1109/83.902286

Shape from recognition: a novel approach for 3-D face shape recovery

2001· article· en· W2125761272 on OpenAlexaff
Dibyendu Nandy, J. Ben-Arie

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePrincipal component analysisRobustness (evolution)Computer visionComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Facial recognition systemFace (sociological concept)BackpropagationArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a novel framework for robust recovery of three-dimensional (3-D) surfaces of faces from single images. The underlying principle is shape from recognition, i.e., the idea that pre-recognizing face parts can constrain the space of possible solutions to the image irradiance equation, thus allowing robust recovery of the 3-D structure of a specific part. Parts of faces like nose, lips and eyes are recognized and localized using robust expansion matching filter templates under varying pose and illumination. Specialized backpropagation based neural networks are then employed to recover the 3-D shape of particular face parts. Representation using principal components allows to efficiently encode classes of objects such as nose, lips, etc. The specialized networks are designed and trained to map the principal component coefficients of the part images to another set of principal component coefficients that represent the corresponding 3-D surface shapes. To achieve robustness to viewing conditions, the network is trained with a wide range of illumination and viewing directions. A method for merging recovered 3-D surface regions by minimizing the sum squared error in overlapping areas is also derived. Quantitative analysis of the reconstruction of the surface parts in varying illumination and pose show relatively small errors, indicating that the method is robust and accurate. Several examples showing recovery of the complete face also illustrate the efficacy of the approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207