MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125764459 · doi:10.1130/l292.1

Transpressive uplift and exhumation of continental lower crust revealed by synkinematic monazite reactions

2013· article· en· W2125764459 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gregory Dumond, Kevin H. Mahan, Michael L. Williams, Michael J. Jercinovic

Bibliographic record

VenueLithosphere · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyContinental crustCrustOrogenyMonaziteShear zoneTranspressionGeochemistryCratonSeismologyLithospherePaleontologyPetrologyTectonicsZircon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Athabasca granulite terrane is exhumed continental lower crust (0.8 to >1.5 GPa ≈ 30 to >50 km paleodepths) exposed north of Lake Athabasca, Canada (Fig. 1A; Mahan et al., 2008).The terrane is composed of Archean to Paleoproterozoic mafi c and felsic granulites, orthogneisses, paragneisses, and minor eclogite bounded on its eastern margin by the 1.85 Ga Legs Lake shear zone (Fig. 1B; Mahan and Williams, 2005).Two main groups of structures have been identifi ed throughout the terrane.The fi rst group (D 1 ) includes subhorizontal to NW-striking, moderately dipping gneissic fabrics (S 1 ), ESE-trending stretching lineations, and recumbent isoclinal folds (F 1 ; Martel et al., 2008;Ashton et al., 2009;Dumond et al., 2010).These composite structures are interpreted as the result of granulite-grade lower-crustal fl ow at 2.60-2.55Ga, defi ning a protracted episode of lower-crustal weakness (Dumond et al., 2010).Group two structures (D 2 ) include several generations of upright, open to tight folds of S 1 and transposition of folds and gneissic fabrics into subvertical to steeply dipping NE-striking mylonitic Transpressive uplift and exhumation of continental lower crust revealed by synkinematic monazite reactions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLithosphereSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207