Student leadership opportunities for making ‘peace’ in Canada’s urban schools: Contradictions in practice.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Qualitative research on the range of anti-violence and peacebuilding-related programming in \nthree large, diverse school districts illuminated contrasting approaches to student participation: teachers \nand administrators empowered differing sub-sets of students as ‘leaders’ in differing ways, to help \nreduce violence and build peer conflict management capacity. The contrasting student roles that were \nimplemented —monitors (enforcing rules), social skills leaders (addressing bullying), peer mediators \n(facilitating dispute resolution), student voice representatives (engaging in democratic consultation), \nand equity advocates (resisting bias and marginalization)— imply differing understandings of ‘peace’ \nand of citizenship. This paper probes the implications of these activities for diverse students’ unequal \nopportunities to develop citizen agency and to build sustainable democratic peace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it