Amine Exchange in Formamidines: An Experimental and Theoretical Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N-H-containing formamidines combine a reasonably strong association to carboxylic acids to form complexes of well-defined geometries with a simultaneous proton-induced electrophilicity enhancement that allows for the exchange of their amine portion. The N=C(H)-NH fragment, therefore, undergoes "imine-like" exchange with N-containing nucleophiles. Because of the prototropic equilibrium, the N=C(H)-NH fragment may behave as a "bisimine" centred on the same carbon, in which both N-containing fragments can be exchanged. Considering the proton-induced sensitisation of both C-N units and the well-defined formamidine-carboxylic acid complex geometry, it should be possible to use carboxylic acids as templates for the synthesis of defined architectures by dynamic amine exchange within formamidines. This study highlights three exchange regimes based on the nature of the incoming amine (aliphatic amines, aromatic amines and alkoxyamines), as well as exchange rules based on the amine leaving groups. Following this analysis, a proof of concept for carboxylic acid templated macrocycle formation through dynamic exchange is provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".