MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125800187 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2010.2049921

A General Procedure for Introducing Structured Nonorthogonal Discretization Grids Into High-Order Finite-Difference Time-Domain Methods

2010· article· en· W2125800187 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationGridConformal mapFinite difference methodTransformation (genetics)Finite differenceMathematicsRegular gridDomain (mathematical analysis)Mathematical analysisCoordinate systemApplied mathematicsFinite element methodFinite-difference time-domain methodTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical optimizationGeometryEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a general procedure for introducing structured nonorthogonal discretization grids into any high-order finite-difference time-domain method originally formulated on a uniform rectangular grid. The proposed procedure employs a coordinate transformation to map a conformal grid-a grid where all cells conform to the material boundaries of the given problem-onto a uniform rectangular grid where any high-order finite-difference scheme can be easily applied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it