MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125807912 · doi:10.1190/1.2235876

Tomographic imaging of permafrost using three-component seismic cone-penetration test

2006· article· en· W2125807912 on OpenAlexaffabout
A -M LeBlanc, Richard Fortier, C. Cosma, Michel Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostGeologyPenetrometerWavelengthSeismologyCone penetration testGeodesyVertical seismic profilePenetration testLithosphereGeotechnical engineeringOpticsSoil scienceTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We conducted seismic cone-penetration tests (SCPT) and tomographic imaging in a permafrost mound in northern Quebec, Canada, to study the cryostratigraphy and assess the seismic properties of permafrost at temperatures near 0°C. A swept impact source generating both P- and S-waves and penetrometer-mounted three-component accelerometers were used to acquire surface-to-depth first-arrival times as input to produce 2D images of P- and S-wave velocities. Based on the three-component accelerometer records and the propagation modes of body waves, the P- and S-wave first arrivals were detected and discriminated. The inversion of the first-arrival times was based on the simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique. The multioffset surface-to-depth geometry used in this study limits the lateral resolution of tomographic imaging. However, the vertical variation in seismic velocities in the permafrost mound shows good reproducibility and can be compared to the cone data. The gathering of cone data such as cone resistance, friction ratio, electrical resistivity, and temperature, along with the seismic velocities, provides new insights into the cryostratigraphy of permafrost. While the cone data are affected by the vertical heterogeneity because of the complex sequence of ice lenses and frozen soil layers of a few centimeters thickness, the smooth velocity variations of P- and S-waves characterized by a wavelength of a few meters depend on the bulk physical properties of permafrost. The P- and S-wave velocities varied from 2400to3200m/s and from 850to1750m/s, respectively, for a temperature range between 0°C and −2°C. At this temperature range, the variations in unfrozen water content are important and affect directly the seismic properties of permafrost. The decrease in P- and S-waves velocities in depth with the permafrost mound depends nonlinearly on the increase of unfrozen water content from 9% to 30% for a temperature increase from −2°Cto0°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207