Speaking Out on Violence and Social Change: Transmedia Storytelling with Remotely Situated Women in Nepal and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2008–2009, Crossing Communities Art Project based in Winnipeg, MB extended its international transmedia project lookinginspeakingout.com to Nepal, in partnership with the Women Foundation Nepal. In this essay we describe the relational creative process between women in our projects in Canada and Nepal, including our collectively directed videos and public forums. Participating women in both countries worked collaboratively with Canadian artists to portray their lives; they described personal histories of gendered violence, enforced widowhood, self-harm, and living with HIV-AIDS. The videos described in this essay including documentary footage of the project are available for screening on the website, www.lookinginspeakingout.com . While the lookinginspeakingout.com project and this essay contribute some new understandings to the emerging field of collective transmedia storytelling in particular with women in remote locations, we recognize that our exploration of participatory video, authorship, social change, and the impacts of relational art projects have raised more questions than answers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".