MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125841758 · doi:10.1109/infcom.1990.91249

Performance modeling of the SIGnet MAN backbone

2002· article· en· W2125841758 on OpenAlexaff
T.D. Todd, A.M. Bignell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Computer networkQueueing theoryMultiplexingExploitNetwork topologyQueueTopology (electrical circuits)MulticastDistributed computingEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traffic processing algorithms are discussed for the slotted interconnected-grid network (SIGnet). SIGnet is intended for use as a high-performance backbone in metropolitan and extended-metropolitan areas. The system is designed to exploit the use of existing wavelength division multiplexing and coherent lightwave technologies. When accommodating nonisochronous traffic classes, the virtual topology in SIGnet is piecewise regular. As a result, bandwidth allocation and network evolution are easily accomplished. The philosophy of the design is to drastically minimize the buffering and protocol requirements at the transmit nodes, thus giving a highly cost-effective implementation. The SIGnet architecture is introduced, and results are given for certain traffic processing algorithms which have been investigated. A two-stage analytic model is presented which allows for the calculation of both detailed link traffic flow rates and the mean queueing delay at individual nodes. The results indicate that in typical subnetworks, reasonable accuracy may be obtained over a wide range of parameter values using link independence assumptions.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207