MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125854233 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2003.816917

Optimal design of multichannel transmultiplexers with stopband energy and passband magnitude constraints

2003· article· en· W2125854233 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Shi, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStopbandPassbandQuadratic equationElliptic filterFinite impulse responseTransition bandMathematical optimizationMagnitude (astronomy)Quadratic programmingControl theory (sociology)Distortion (music)Iterative designImpulse (physics)Optimal designEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceMathematicsFilter (signal processing)Filter designAlgorithmPrototype filterBand-pass filterPhysicsElectronic engineeringScheduling (production processes)EngineeringGeometryBandwidth (computing)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optimal design incorporating filter stopband energy and passband magnitude constraints is studied for multichannel, uniform, and nonuniform transmultiplexers. Central to the development is a reformulation of the design problem as a quadratic programming problem with quadratic constraints and semi-infinite constraints while the composite distortion measure for reconstruction is minimized. An iterative optimal design procedure for finite-impulse-response synthesis and analysis filters is developed and applied to two design examples, one for the uniform case and another for the nonuniform case based on general building blocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal ProcessingSame topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207