MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125950243 · doi:10.1109/robot.2002.1014387

Kinematics and stiffness of a symmetrical 3-UPU translational parallel manipulator

2003· article· en· W2125950243 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Goldsmith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevolute jointKinematicsParallel manipulatorDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)StiffnessControl theory (sociology)Kinematic chainBase (topology)Computer scienceMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineeringClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates a symmetrical configuration of a known 3-UPU manipulator having three extensible legs and 3 translational degrees of freedom. The kinematics are expressed with respect to a frame that in aligned with the three legs when they are mutually orthogonal. The resulting kinematic equations are symmetric with respect to the three tool coordinates. It is shown that the manipulator stiffness is much greater with the prismatic joints actuated than with the revolute joints actuated. Design enhancements are described for increasing the degrees of freedom to 4 or 6 and for fixing the motors to the stationary base.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207