On the Solution of Spherically Symmetric Static Problem for a Fluid Sphere in General Relativity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the spherically symmetric static problem of General Theory of Relativity (GTR) originally solved by K. Schwarzschild in 1916 for a particular form of the line element. This classical solution specifies the metric tensor for the external and internal semi-Riemannian spaces for a perfect fluid sphere with constant density and includes the so called gravitational radius rg which is associated with the singular behavior of the solution. The Schwarzschild solution for the external space becomes singular if the sphere radius reaches rg which is referred to as the radius of the Black Hole event horizon. The solution for the internal space gives infinitely high fluid pressure at the center of sphere with radius equal to 9/8 rg. In contrast to the classical solution, the solution presented in the paper is based on the general form of line element for spherically symmetric Riemannian space in which the circumferential component of the metric tensor f2(r) is an arbitrary function of the radial coordinate. As shown, the solution of the static problem exists for a whole class of functions f(r). The particular form of this function is determined in the paper under the assumption according to which the gravitation, changing the Euclidean space to the Riemannian space inside the sphere in accordance with GTR equations, does not affect the sphere mass. The solution obtained for the proposed particular form of the line element cannot be singular neither on the sphere surface nor at the sphere center. Direct comparison with the Schwarzschild solution for external and internal spaces is presented
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".