Arte y símbolo para el poder: intervención en la Cruz Alzada Procesional de Osuna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El proceso de investigación e intervención de la Cruz Alzada Procesional de Osuna (Sevilla) ha constituido una de las prácticas en metales más interesantes del Centro de Intervención del IAPH. En el marco de la metodología interdisciplinar de este Centro, a los trabajos de conservación y restauración, los medios no destructivos de examen de la fotografía, la química o la biología, o los estudios históricos, se añadieron las aportaciones de un maestro orfebre. El presente artículo pretende transferir, ante la escasez de textos divulgativos en español de experiencias en la restauración de platería, los pormenores de la intervención. Del mismo modo se presentan las conclusiones de las investigaciones aplicadas, con especial incidencia en la datación, contextualización y análisis histórico de la obra, así como la caracterización material de los elementos que la constituyen, las técnicas de ejecución primigenias y las alteraciones del original hasta nuestros días.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".