MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125985846 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2004.840970

A parallel-plate waveguide model of lossy microstrip lines

2005· article· en· W2125985846 on OpenAlexaff
Guennadi A. Kouzaev, M. Jamal Deen, Natalia K. Nikolova

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostripLossy compressionPropagation constantTransmission lineLossless compressionDielectricPermittivityElectrical impedanceBoundary value problemCharacteristic impedanceDielectric lossOpticsPhysicsAcousticsMathematical analysisMathematicsOptoelectronicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved semi-analytical model of a lossy microstrip transmission line is proposed. The model is based on the theory of the fundamental transverse magnetic mode of a lossy parallel-plate waveguide whose dielectric medium is assigned the effective permittivity of the respective lossless microstrip line. The complex propagation constant of the fundamental mode is computed by imposing the Leontovitch boundary condition at the upper and lower plates whose impedances take into account the thickness of the conductors and the current crowding effect. The dielectric loss is computed by perturbation formulas. The proposed model features high accuracy and computational efficiency at frequencies up to 100 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207