La formation à l’offre de services en français dans les programmes de santé et de service social en milieu minoritaire francophone au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les professionnels des services sociaux et de santé disent être peu outillés pour travailler auprès des communautés francophones en situation minoritaire (CFSM). Une meilleure connaissance des pratiques d’enseignement professionnel utilisées dans ces domaines, et axées sur des approches pédagogiques congruentes et des contenus de formation significatifs sur les besoins particuliers des CFSM, aiderait à bonifier la formation des futurs professionnels. Une recension des écrits sur les approches pédagogiques utilisées dans divers contextes linguistiques minoritaires a inspiré l’élaboration d’un questionnaire adressé aux formateurs des programmes de langue française en santé et en service social au Canada. Les résultats indiquent que les formateurs eux-mêmes se sentent peu outillés pour bien former leurs étudiants à travailler en contexte francophone minoritaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".