Anartria Pura: Estudo de Dois Casos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O marco do nascimento da neurolingüística é considerado a publicação do livro A síndrome de Desintegração Fonética, em 1939, que teve como autores: um neurologista, um psicólogo e uma lingüista. Dez anos mais tarde foi publicado, pela mesma equipe de pesquisadores franceses, o distúrbio de fala do paciente portador de anartria pura. No presente artigo, situaremos as polêmicas históricas a respeito de um distúrbio seletivo de fala de origem telencefálica, apresentaremos o primeiro caso descrito, acompanhado da descrição anátomo-patológica do cérebro que estivera guardado em formol por 20 anos e, realizada por um de nós (ARL), e por fim, apresentaremos um caso brasileiro, cujas imagens tomográficas de seu cérebro e espectográficas de sua fala e voz confirmam o trabalho pioneiro de Alajouanine, Pichot e Durant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".