MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126060309 · doi:10.1002/mame.201000406

Morphology Development in Novel Composition of Thermoplastic Vulcanizates Based on PA12/PDMS Reactive Blends

2011· article· en· W2126060309 on OpenAlexaff
Skander Mani, Philippe Cassagnau, Mosto Bousmina, Philippe Chaumont

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCompatibilizationThermoplasticMorphology (biology)Polymer blendScanning electron microscopePhase (matter)Thermoplastic elastomerComposite materialChemical engineeringCopolymerPolymerChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The main objective of the present work was to tailor a new thermoplastic vulcanisate (TPV) composed of PA 12 as the thermoplastic phase and PDMS as the rubber phase. The PDMS was crosslinked by dicumyl peroxide (DCP). Interestingly, addition of 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidinyloxyl (TEMPO) to the TPV provided the compatibilization of the PA12/PDMS blend in the dynamic process and gave a new material with control structure and morphology. The electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) studies revealed that adding silica nanoparticles and Lotader in PA12 and PDMS phases, respectively, led to a drastic reduction in R v of the PDMS particles from 16.5 µm (virgin blend) to nearly 0.6 µm for the PA12/PDMS reactive blend. Therefore, a stable co‐continuous morphology was obtained for the new TPV based on 60–40 wt.‐% of PDMS‐PA12 blend. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Materials and EngineeringSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207