MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126092239 · doi:10.2166/wqrjc.2012.017

Spatial distributions and temporal trends in pollutants in the Great Lakes 1968–2008

2011· article· en· W2126092239 on OpenAlexaffabout
Debbie Burniston, Paul Klawunn, Sean Backus, Brad Hill, Alice Dove, Jasmine Waltho, Violeta Richardson, John Struger, Lisa Bradley, Daryl J. McGoldrick, Chris Marvin

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollutantEnvironmental scienceSedimentSurface waterContaminationPolybrominated diphenyl ethersPeriod (music)PesticideHydrology (agriculture)Environmental chemistryEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental engineeringGeologyEcologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Lakes have been the focus of intensive long-term research and monitoring programmes for the past 40 years. Spatial distributions and temporal trends have been determined for a range of environmental compartments, including surface water, sediment and fish. In general, there have been dramatic reductions in contamination by legacy pollutants including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides and metals. Concentrations of PCBs and lead in surface water at the mouth of the Niagara River have decreased by 58 and 54%, respectively, over the period 1986–2007. Correspondingly, concentrations of PCBs and lead in offshore sediments of Lake Ontario have decreased by 37 and 45%, respectively, since peak accumulations in the 1970s. Temporal trends for more modern chemicals, including polybrominated diphenylethers and perfluoroalkyl compounds, showed increases up until 2000 when management actions and heightened stakeholder awareness resulted in a levelling off or decline in the subsequent time period. While legacy issues are largely associated with areas of historical industrial activity, the presence of newer chemicals is generally associated with modern urban/industrial areas that act as diffuse sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207