Investigations of the spin Hamiltonian parameters for the cubic Mn<sup>2+</sup> centers in ZnX (X = S, Se, Te) and CdTe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spin Hamiltonian parameters (g factors and the hyperfine structure constants) for the cubic Mn2+ centers in ZnX (X = S, Se, Te) and CdTe are investigated theoretically using the perturbation formulas of these parameters for a tetrahedral 3d5 cluster containing both the crystal-field and charge-transfer contributions. The relevant molecular orbital coefficients are uniformly determined from the cluster approach, and the calculated spin Hamiltonian parameters are in good agreement with the observed values. The g-shifts of the g factors related to the pure spin value gs (≈ 2.0023) arising from the charge transfer contributions are opposite (positive) in sign and much larger in magnitude than those from the crystal field contributions. On the other hand, the contributions from the charge-transfer mechanism to the hyperfine structure constants are the same in sign and about 20%–30% in magnitude of those from the crystal-field mechanism. The importance of the charge transfer contributions increases significantly with the increase of the covalency and the spin–orbit coupling coefficient of the ligand, i.e., S2− < Se2− < Te2−.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".