Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte examine le processus de racisation que vivent les individus de culture ou de foi musulmane. Il identifie deux processus d’assignation de l’identité islamique : l’un externe aux groupes musulmans, en provenance des groupes majoritaires, et l’autre interne, issu du courant de l’islam politique. Si l’approche postcoloniale a été fort utile pour déconstruire le regard des dominants, elle a eu tendance à ignorer les discours de domination à l’intérieur des groupes minoritaires, et à traiter indifféremment tous les discours en provenance des groupes majoritaires, associés à la pensée raciale. Or la perception des musulmans comme menace procède de deux points de vue différents, l’un associé à la « logique de l’Emprire » et l’autre à la « logique de la République ». La distinction entre ces deux logiques et l’identification des discours de domination dans les cultures subalternes permettent de mieux cerner le processus de racisation et d’entrevoir du même coup des voies d’action solidaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".