MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126147061 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0762

LKB1 Catalytically Deficient Mutants Enhance Cyclin D1 Expression

2007· article· en· W2126147061 on OpenAlexaff
Kristine D. Scott, Suchita Nath-Sain, Meghan D. Agnew, Paola A. Marignani

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclin D1Cancer researchCancerSuppressorMutantCell cycleBiologyOncogeneCyclinKinaseCyclin DCell growthTumor suppressor geneCell biologyGeneticsCarcinogenesisGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations in the serine-threonine tumor-suppressor kinase LKB1 are responsible for Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, characterized by hamartomatous proliferation and an increased risk of developing cancer. Mutations in lkb1 have also been identified in sporadic cancers, suggesting a wider role for LKB1 in cancer that is not limited to hamartomatous polyposis syndromes. Here, we show that LKB1 catalytically deficient mutants, when introduced into DLD1p21-/-p53-/- colorectal cancer cells, allowed for progression of cells through to S phase of cell cycle and elicited the expression of Rb, cyclin E, and cyclin A2 whereas the introduction of LKB1 lead to G1 cell cycle arrest independent of p21(WAF/CIP1) and/or p53 expression. Furthermore, we show that LKB1 catalytically deficient mutants activate the expression of cyclin D1 through recruitment to response elements within the promoter of the oncogene. In addition to compromising the tumor-suppressor function of LKB1, our findings highlight an emerging role for LKB1 catalytically deficient mutants, a gain of oncogenic properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207