MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126156000 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2007.144

A Novel Scheduling Algorithm for Video Traffic in High-Rate WPANs

2007· article· en· W2126156000 on OpenAlexaff
Shahab Moradi, A. Hamed Mohsenian Rad, Vincent W. S. Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Quality of serviceComputer networkReinforcement learningProvisioningWirelessDecoding methodsAlgorithmReal-time computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging high-rate wireless personal area network (WPAN) technology is capable of supporting high-speed and high-quality real-time multimedia applications. In particular, MPEG-4 video streams are deemed to be a widespread traffic type. However, in the current IEEE 802.15.3 standard for media access control (MAC) of high-rate WPANs, the implementation details of some key issues such as scheduling and quality of service (QoS) provisioning have not been addressed. In this paper, we first propose a mathematical model for the optimal scheduling scheme for MPEG-4 flows in high-rate WPANs. We also propose an RL scheduler based on the reinforcement learning (RL) technique. Simulation results show that our proposed RL scheduler achieves nearly optimal performance and performs better than F-SRPT (Mangharam et al., 2004), EDD+SRPT (Torok et al., 2005), and PAP (Kim and Cho, 2005) scheduling algorithms in terms of a lower decoding failure rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207