MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126191599 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2002.86.4.405

Evaluation of Composts for Suppression of Dollar Spot (<i>Sclerotinia homoeocarpa</i>) of Turfgrass

2002· article· en· W2126191599 on OpenAlexaff
Jeanine I. Boulter, Greg J. Boland, J. T. Trevors

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurfgrass Adaptation and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompostBiologyFungicideChlorothalonilPopulationAgronomyHorticultureToxicologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of composts in turfgrass disease management allows for a reduction in pesticide use in chemical control practices. Disease suppressive properties of composts rely on a number of factors including microbial activity, microbial population dynamics, nutrient concentrations, and other associated chemical and physical factors. Five composts were evaluated for suppression of dollar spot caused by Sclerotinia homoeocarpa. The dollar spot disease suppressive properties of selected compost formulations prepared in different years was evaluated. A third objective was to examine the effects of storage of compost (1 year) on the suppression of dollar spot. Field experiments were conducted in 1998 with compost prepared in 1997 to 1998. Applications of compost every 3 weeks throughout the season suppressed dollar spot of turf to levels not significantly different than applications of chlorothalonil fungicide applied at the manufacturer's lowest recommended preventative rate of 38.4 ml a.i./100 m2 every 2 weeks (P = 0.05). Single applications of composts at the start of the 1998 season were not effective in reducing disease. Field experiments in 1999 evaluated batches of two selected compost formulations, one batch produced in 1998 to 1999, another stored since production in 1997 to 1998. Composts were effective in suppressing disease to levels not significantly different than the fungicide controls, which showed up to 33% disease in 1998 and up to 31% disease in 1999 (P = 0.05). Storage of composts for up to 1 year did not affect their ability to reduce dollar spot severity (P = 0.05). The use of composts as plant disease suppressants is not likely to replace the use of commercial fungicides in dollar spot management. However, multiple applications of compost may reduce incidence and severity of dollar spot to levels at which chemical control may be reduced or eliminated for a significant portion of the season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicTurfgrass Adaptation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207