Cardiac phaeochromocytoma presenting with severe hypertension and chest pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac phaeochromocytoma is a rare cause of endocrine hypertension. We report a case of a 25-year-old woman, who presented with severe hypertension and intermittent chest pain. The patient denied typical phaeochromocytoma spells of palpitation, headache, and diaphoresis. The 24-hr urinary excretion of norepinephrine was increased sevenfold above the upper limit of normal; however, the excretion of total metanephrines, epinephrine, and dopamine were normal. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen was normal. An 131I-labelled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan was falsely negative while the patient was taking labetalol. The cardiac phaeochromocytoma was localized with indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy and chest magnetic resonance imaging scan. Repeat 123I-MIBG scintigraphy was positive after discontinuing labetalol. The cardiac phaeochromocytoma was located in the right atrial groove, adjacent to the tricuspid valve, and contained multiple feeder arteries from the right coronary artery. After treatment with volume expansion, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, and alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade, surgical resection was performed. While under cardiopulmonary bypass, coronary bypass grafting and tricuspid annuloplasty were performed to facilitate the complete surgical resection of the 4.5-cm tumour. The surgical course was uncomplicated, with complete cure of hypertension and normalization of catecholamine excretion. Post-operative cardiac function, as measured by echocardiogram, was normal. Although cardiac phaeochromocytoma may be highly vascular, invasive and difficult to resect, it can be cured.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".