SER Analysis and PDF Derivation for Multi-Hop Amplify-and-Forward Relay Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An amplify-and-forward, multi-branch, multi-hop relay system with K relays, in which the relays broadcast to other relays as well as the destination, is analyzed. An approximate symbol-error-rate (SER) expression, which is valid for any number of relays and for several modulation schemes, is found for the multi-hop system. Also, the cumulative density function (CDF) and probability density function (PDF) are found for the random variable, Z = XY/(X + Y + c), where X and Y are sums of independent, Erlang random variables, and c is a constant. The moment generating function (MGF) of Z is found for the special case in which c = 0. It is shown that these results are generalizations of previously published results for special cases of Z. The MGF of Z is used to develop the approximate SER expression. Results for the analytic SER expression are included and compared with simulation results for various values of K, for various modulation schemes, and for two choices of system parameters (channel variances). Results for the multi-hop system are also compared to results for the two-hop system (in which relays transmit only to the destination).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".