Les modèles de relations homme-femme dans les images publicitaires de quatre magazines féminins québécois de 1993 et de 2003. Du couple Harlequin au couple égalitaire menacé
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le mouvement féministe a exercé une influence indéniable sur l’image des couples dans les médias. À partir des travaux d’Erving Goffman, l’auteure a analysé les parades de subordination chez les couples des publicités de quatre magazines féminins de 1993 et de 2003. Les parades étudiées comprennent la taille relative, le cérémonial du statut social, la ritualisation de la subordination et le retrait de la situation sociale. Leur somme permet de dégager trois modèles : le modèle traditionnel, qui s’est accru en dix ans; le modèle inversé, dont la proportion est restée identique; et le modèle égalitaire, qui a rétréci comme peau de chagrin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it