Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discovering depth from stereopsis is difficult because the quality of un-cooled sensors is not sufficient for generating dense depth maps. We show how to produce sparse disparity maps from uncalibrated infrared stereo images which can be interpolated to produce a dense/semi-dense depth field. In our proposed technique, the sparse disparity map is produced by a robust features-based stereo matching method capable of dealing with the problems of infrared images, such as low resolution and high noise. Initially, a set of stable features are extracted from stereo pairs using the phase congruency model, which contrary to the gradient-based feature detectors, provides features that are invariant to geometric transformations. Then, a set of log-Gabor wavelet coefficients at different orientations and frequencies is used to analyze and describe the extracted features for matching. The resulting sparse disparity map is then refined by triangular and epipolar geometrical constraints. In densifying the sparse map, a watershed transformation is applied to divide the image into several segments, where the disparity inside each segment is assumed to vary smoothly. The surface of each segment is then reconstructed independently by fitting a spline to its known disparities. Results indicate strong correlation with ground truth. The marginal results from the watershed segmentation on IR is chiefly responsible for the errors in the reconstructed depth map.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it