Optical Emission of Conjugated Polymers Adsorbed to Nanoporous Alumina
Classification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Composites of conjugated polymers poly(2-methoxy-5-(2‘-ethyl-hexyloxy)- p -phenylene vinylene) (MEH-PPV) and poly(2,3-diphenyl)phenylene vinylene) (DP-PPV) adsorbed to porous alumina (PA) membranes have been prepared. Time-integrated and time-resolved optical emission properties of these materials at 77 K have been studied and compared with those of bulk thin films of these polymers. Observed blue shifts of the PL spectra (0.034−0.183 eV) for the PA-adsorbed polymers as compared to the bulk are attributed to the isolation of the polymer chains on the PA surface. The energy dependences of the fast decay rates measured on the blue side of the no-phonon emission peak in bulk and PA-adsorbed DP-PPV are very similar to each other. These results suggest that the intrachain diffusion of electron−hole excitations, either in the bulk or adsorbed to porous alumina, is very similar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it