MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126290044 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2007.4488574

3.2-Gb/s 1024-b rate-1/2 LDPC decoder chip using a flooding-type update-schedule algorithm

2007· article· en· W2126290044 on OpenAlexaff
Naoya Onizawa, Takahiro Hanyu, Vincent Gaudet

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceDecoding methodsAlgorithmParallel computingChipBottleneckClock rateNode (physics)ComputationFlooding (psychology)ScheduleReal-time computingEmbedded systemEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a high-speed low-density parity-check (LDPC) decoder chip using a new decoding algorithm, called a flooding-type update-schedule algorithm. Since node computations are performed using partially updated messages in the proposed algorithm, because of the good similarity among time-consecutive messages, data-transmission bottleneck between nodes for node computation is greatly reduced. Moreover, longer wires between nodes are appropriately divided into several subwires by inserting flip-flops so that system clock frequency for the LDPC decoding scheme can be much increased while maintaining the same BER as a conventional algorithm using fully updated messages. In fact, a throughput of 3.2Gb/s in a 1024-b LDPC decoder chip under 90nm CMOS technology is attained with the sufficient BER.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207