MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126316496 · doi:10.1071/aseg2007ab110

Enhancing the Exploration Process

2007· article· en· W2126316496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalMira Geoscience (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)GeophysicsGeologyProcess (computing)Context (archaeology)Earth scienceExploration geophysicsComputer sciencePaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryGeophysics can play an enhanced role in exploration programs when used in conjunction with geology and physical properties. Understanding how geology relates to geophysics is important both for supporting constrained geophysical modelling, and for extracting meaningful information from geophysics. Physical properties, and how geologic processes control physical properties, play a key role to link geology to geophysics and are an important focus of our research. In addition, methods of describing geology in a manner that can be incorporated into geophysical inversions provide another important link between geology and geophysics to aid in the integration process. This information is brought together and applied to deterministic inversion methods that have been developed at the University of British Columbia. When done in the context of a specific exploration goal, earth models can be produced that capture, and are consistent with, available geoscientific information, resulting in a clearer view of the earth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it