MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126374091 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2004.1326578

Interactive video retrieval using embedded audio content

2004· article· en· W2126374091 on OpenAlexaff
Tahir Amin, M. Zeylinoght, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSearch engine indexingFeature (linguistics)Feature vectorWaveletSimilarity (geometry)Relevance feedbackMixture modelArtificial intelligenceScheme (mathematics)Feature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)Laplace operatorDigital audioWavelet transformImage retrievalAudio signalImage (mathematics)Speech recognitionMathematicsSpeech coding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Audio is a rich source of information in the digital videos that can provide useful descriptors for indexing the video databases. In this paper, we model the shape of the distribution of wavelet coefficients of embedded audio with a Laplacian mixture. The distributions of wavelet coefficients are very peaky in nature. The shape of these distributions can be modeled with only two components in the Laplacian mixture with low computational complexity. The parameters of this mixture model form a low dimensional feature vector representing global similarity of the audio content of the video clips. An interactive approach involving the feature vector updating scheme is used to adapt the retrieval system to the users' needs. This relevance feedback (RF) increases the retrieval ratio substantially. A comprehensive experimental evaluation using the CNN news database has been performed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207