MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126387455 · doi:10.7202/030568ar

Mille ans. Interprétation allégorique et littérale du millénium de l’Apocalypse

2005· article· fr· W2126387455 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diane Brouillet

Bibliographic record

VenueProtée · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 431 après Jésus-Christ, l’Église condamne le millénarisme et déclare que la croyance au millénium est une hérésie. Par ce décret, l’Église s’élève contre une conception trop terrestre et trop matérielle de l’idéal chrétien et prend par le fait même une position tant politique que religieuse. L’entreprise de marginalisation du millénarisme est le résultat d’un travail d’interprétation complexe auquel ont participé les plus illustres Pères de l’Église. Nous traiterons ici de l’interprétation de saint Augustin qui, dans De la doctrine chrétienne et dans La Cité de Dieu , échafaude une réflexion visant la liquidation du millénarisme et la proclamation du règne spirituel de l’Église. Cette interprétation de saint Augustin prévaut encore aujourd’hui et permet la distinction entre les groupes catholiques traditionnels et les groupes marginaux adeptes des différentes sectes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtéeSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207