MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126452294 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2006.18596

A Year in the Life of ACEN!

2006· article· en· W2126452294 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jessica Kerr, Mary Ellen Jeans

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Trauma and Injuries
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nurses Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyNursingMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Once each year we publish the ACEN Annual Report in this column.This year is no exception, but first, an update on our recent annual education day and Annual General Meeting.The ACEN education day was dedicated to leadership development.The day was facilitated by Leslie Southwick-Trask, who is well known for her success in fostering change and assisting groups, companies, boards and others to "think outside the box" and act as change agents.The theme for the day was "Nursing Leadershift," which prompted a very high level of interaction, emotional discomfort, humour and thoughtful discussion.People worked together in small groups, a format that encouraged personal communication and networking.There

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1080.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicAbdominal Trauma and InjuriesFrench-language works237,207