MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126461369 · doi:10.1177/0363546511403282

Characterization of Subchondral Bone Repair for Marrow-Stimulated Chondral Defects and Its Relationship to Articular Cartilage Resurfacing

2011· article· en· W2126461369 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongmei Chen, Anik Chevrier, Caroline D. Hoemann, Jun Sun, Wei Ouyang, Michael D. Buschmann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPiramal (Canada)Polytechnique Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCartilageSubchondral boneArticular cartilage repairArticular cartilageX-ray microtomographyAnatomyBone marrowPathologyOsteoarthritisRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Microfracture and drilling are bone marrow-stimulation techniques that initiate cartilage repair by providing access to cell populations in subchondral bone marrow. This study examined the effect of hole depth and of microfracture versus drilling on subchondral bone repair and cartilage repair in full-thickness chondral defects. HYPOTHESES: Repaired subchondral bone does not reconstitute its native structure and exhibits atypical morphologic features. Drilling deeper induces greater bone remodeling and is related to improved cartilage repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Trochlear cartilage defects debrided of the calcified layer were prepared bilaterally in 16 skeletally mature rabbits. Drill holes were made to a depth of 2 mm or 6 mm and microfracture holes to 2 mm. Animals were sacrificed 3 months postoperatively, and joints were scanned by micro-computed tomography before histoprocessing. Bone repair was assessed with a novel scoring system and by 3-dimentional micro-computed tomography and compared with intact controls. Correlation of subchondral bone features to cartilage repair outcome was performed. RESULTS: Although surgical holes were partly repaired with mineralized tissue, atypical features such as residual holes, cysts, and bony overgrowth were frequently observed. For all treatment groups, repair led to an average bone volume density similar to that of the controls but the repair bone was more porous and branched as shown by significantly higher bone surface area density and connectivity density. Deeper versus shallower drilling induced a larger region of repairing and remodeling subchondral bone that positively correlated with improved cartilage repair. CONCLUSION: Incomplete reconstitution of normal bone structure and continued remodeling occurred in chondral defects 3 months after bone marrow stimulation. Deep drilling induced a larger volume of repairing and remodeling bone, which appeared beneficial for chondral repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bone marrow stimulation does not reconstitute normal bone structure. Strategies that increase subchondral bone involvement in marrow stimulation could further benefit cartilage repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207