MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126491814 · doi:10.1109/icme.2000.869663

TBLB algorithm for servicing real-time multimedia traffic streams

2002· article· en· W2126491814 on OpenAlexaff
William K. Wong, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToken bucketComputer scienceLeaky bucketQuality of serviceJitterComputer networkReal-time computingNetwork packetTraffic policingBandwidth (computing)Security tokenTraffic shapingAlgorithmNetwork traffic control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose to use a simple packet servicing algorithm suitable for servicing bursty real-time multimedia traffic streams in packet-switched networks. These real-time multimedia services may include packetized voice and videoconference/playback. The servicing mechanism is an enhancement of the token bank leaky bucket (TBLB) scheme we proposed previously. This new algorithm combines both the servicing and the policing functions, and its performance in accommodating bursty real-time traffic is evaluated by computer simulations. We show that the quality of service (QoS) performance (mean delay and jitter) of TBLB exceeds that of the leaky-bucket constrained generalized processor sharing (GPS). Although GPS has been proven to give bounded delay to a leaky-bucket constrained traffic stream and ensure instantaneous fair allocation of bandwidth, the average delay is often quite large. Also, fairness is not a guarantee of QoS, and is not perceived by users directly. Another property that is often neglected in the analysis of schedulers (but very important to user QoS) is the sensitivity of QoS to deviations of traffic streams from their specified traffic descriptors. We present results to show that our proposed method is relatively robust to such deviations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207