MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126524517 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.117

Optimal Cell Size in Multi-Hop Cellular Networks

2008· article· en· W2126524517 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHop (telecommunications)Cellular networkComputer networkContext (archaeology)Small cellDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3G-based Multi-hop cellular networks (MCNs) inherit a special characteristic of 3G systems, namely the relationship between a cell's coverage and its capacity. At the planning stage, a cell may be statically set to have small coverage with high capacity, a large coverage with small capacity, or some other fixed settings in between. Such static settings, however, do not adapt to the projected dynamic nature of users in 3G-especially in an MCN environment. In this paper, we propose the Optimal Cell Size (OCS) scheme for a 3G TDD W-CDMA MCN multi-cell environment. Given the cell capacity function, users' distribution and demands, OCS yields optimal cell sizes that maximize the system throughput through balancing coverage and capacity. Not only can OCS cope with dynamic network conditions, but it can also be considered as an aid to the network planning process. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multi-cell optimal cell size scheme in the context of MCNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207