MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126539561 · doi:10.5555/359640.359785

The impact of human resources practices on IT personnel commitment, citizenship behaviors, and turnover intentions

2000· article· en· W2126539561 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guy Paré, Michel Tremblay, Patrick C. Lalonde

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Information Systems · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipPolitical scienceNoticeHumanitiesLibrary scienceManagementLawArtEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CIRANOLe CIRANO est un organisme sans but lucratif constitue en vertu de la Loi des compagnies du Quebec. Lefinancement de son infrastructure et de ses activites de recherche provient des cotisations de ses organisations-membres, d’une subvention d’infrastructure du ministere de la Recherche, de la Science et de la Technologie, dememe que des subventions et mandats obtenus par ses equipes de recherche.CIRANO is a private non-profit organization incorporated under the Quebec Companies Act. Its infrastructure andresearch activities are funded through fees paid by member organizations, an infrastructure grant from theMinistere de la Recherche, de la Science et de la Technologie, and grants and research mandates obtained by itsresearch teams.Les organisations-partenaires / The Partner Organizations•Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales•Ecole Polytechnique•Universite Concordia•Universite de Montreal•Universite du Quebec a Montreal•Universite Laval•Universite McGill•MEQ•MRST•Alcan Aluminium Ltee•AXA Canada•Banque Nationale du Canada•Banque Royale du Canada•Bell Quebec•Bombardier•Bourse de Montreal•Developpement des ressources humaines Canada (DRHC)•Federation des caisses populaires Desjardins de Montreal et de l’Ouest-du-Quebec•Hydro-Quebec•Imasco•Industrie Canada•Pratt & Whitney Canada Inc.•Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton•Ville de Montreal© 2000 Guy Pare et Michel Tremblay. Tous droits reserves. All rights reserved.Reproduction partielle permise avec citation du document source, incluant la notice ©.Short sections may be quoted without explicit permission, provided that full credit, including © notice, is given tothe source.ISSN 1198-8177Ce document est publie dans l’intention de rendre accessibles les resultats preliminairesde la recherche effectuee au CIRANO, afin de susciter des echanges et des suggestions.Les idees et les opinions emises sont sous l’unique responsabilite des auteurs, et nerepresentent pas necessairement les positions du CIRANO ou de ses partenaires.This paper presents preliminary research carried out at CIRANO and aims atencouraging discussion and comment. The observations and viewpoints expressed are thesole responsibility of the authors. They do not necessarily represent positions of CIRANOor its partners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Information SystemsSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207