Embryonic catalase protects against endogenous and phenytoin‐enhanced DNA oxidation and embryopathies in acatalasemic and human catalase‐expressing mice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), which is detoxified by catalase, are implicated in fetal death and birth defects. However, embryonic levels of catalase are only ∼ 5% of adult activity, and its protective role is not understood completely. Herein, we used mutant catalase-deficient mice [acatalasemic (aCat)] and transgenic mice expressing human catalase (hCat), which, respectively, exhibited 40-50% reductions and 2-fold elevations in the activities of embryonic and fetal brain catalase, to show that embryonic catalase protects the embryo from both physiological oxidative stress and the ROS-initiating antiepileptic drug phenytoin. Compared to wild-type (WT) catalase-normal controls, both untreated and phenytoin-exposed aCat mice exhibited a 30% increase in embryonic DNA oxidation and a >2-fold increase in embryopathies, both of which were completely blocked by protein therapy with exogenous catalase. Conversely, compared to WT controls, untreated and, to a lesser extent, phenytoin-exposed hCat mice were protected, with untreated hCat embryos exhibiting a 40% decrease in embryonic DNA oxidation and up to a 67% decrease in embryopathies. Embryonic catalase accordingly plays an important protective role, and both physiological and phenytoin-enhanced oxidative stress can be embryopathic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it