MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126566562 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2009.5332745

Enhanced EMG signal processing for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control

2009· article· en· W2126566562 on OpenAlexafffund
Johnny L G Nielsen, S. Holmgaard, Ning Jiang, Kevin Englehart, D. Farina, P. Parker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBevica Fonden
KeywordsComputer scienceWristSIGNAL (programming language)Signal processingArtificial neural networkMultilayer perceptronPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceElectromyographyIsometric exercisePerceptronFrequency domainTime domainFeature extractionSpeech recognitionComputer visionComputer hardwareDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new signal processing scheme is presented for extracting neural control information from the multi-channel surface electromyographic signal (sEMG). The extracted information can be used to proportionally control a multi-degree of freedom (DOF) prosthesis. Four time-domain (TD) features were extracted from the multi-channel sEMG during a series of anisotonic, isometric wrist contractions, which involved simultaneous activations of the three DOF of the wrist. The forces produced at the three wrist DOFs during these contractions were also collected using a customized force sensor. The extracted features and the recorded force signals, as input/target pairs, were then used to train a multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network. A five-fold cross-validation training/testing method was applied. The resulting performance is a significant improvement over a previously proposed sEMG processing method for the proportional, multi-DOF myoelectric control task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207