Understanding on the Background of the Era of Independent Innovations in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Independence in the independent innovation emphasizes that innovation (or realization of the principal) is belong to our country; from the perspective of overemphasizing the technology-dependent to understand the point of independence; from the perspective of safeguarding national security to understand the independence ; from the perspective of adjustment of the economic structure, and the transformation of the mode of growth to understand the point of independence; from the perspective of economic efficiency to improve understanding of the manufacturing industry's independence; from the perspective of building a resource-saving society to understand independence . Key words: Independent innovation, Innovation, Reliance on technology, National security, resource-saving society Resume: L’ « independance » dans l’innovation independante souligne que l’innovation appartient a notre pays, on doit comprendre le point d’ « independance » dans la perspective de la sur-accentuation la « technologie-dependance », de la sauvegarde de la securite nationale, de l’ajustement de la structure economique, de la transformation du mode de croissance, de la construction d’une societe econome de ressources et de l’efficience economique. Mots-Cles: innovation independante, innovation, dependre de la technologie, securite nationale, societe econome de ressources
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".